WHY ON EARTH SMOKERS TARGETTED WHILE DRUNKARDS WANDER SCOTT FREE

Was it prudent to ban smoking when drinking is freely allowed

If turn the newspapers you would daily, without any exception, observe that maximum number of deaths is caused by liquor than passive smoking - but who cares about this

We hear there has been deaths caused by adulterated drinks like arrack etc and the toll this claims is on a higher side than the cigarettes moreover cigarettes may affect an individual - bad alright - but drinks affect families and make them stray on the roads these were the ones whom we see daily lying - the so called நாட்டின் குடிமகன் - on the road

Consuming liquor they drive vehicles into the platforms and on pedestrians who either walk on the road or sleep on them We have a case to the point where one of our friends who was left at a hotel by a colleague of his for lunch shockingly heard in less than an hour that the man who went for lunch was no more Unfortunately, he while on his return - ofcourse walking on the street - was hit by a speeding Pulsar - both the driver and the pillion were totally drunk- and laid his life on the spot WAS THIS HIS MISTAKE TO HAVE WALKED ON THE ROAD???? Are these guys penalised for taking away innocent life if he is influential you know what would happen !

Is the Goverment blind to these types of accidents caused by drunkards insted take on the smokers the effect on the society is not proportionte to drunken drive or they do not want to touch one of the highest revenue churning channel.

HAIL DRUNKARDS DETEST SMOKERS